<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>AI in Design on Butterswords | Where Words &gt;= Swords</title><link>https://butterswords.com/tags/ai-in-design/</link><description>Recent content in AI in Design on Butterswords | Where Words &gt;= Swords</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 09:54:49 -0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://butterswords.com/tags/ai-in-design/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Starting to evaluate agent usefulness</title><link>https://butterswords.com/blog/agent-usefulness/</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 09:54:49 -0700</pubDate><guid>https://butterswords.com/blog/agent-usefulness/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently talked with a friend and collaborator about agents and the usefulness of products such as Anthropic&amp;rsquo;s Claude (incl. Cowork and Claude Code). We did not agree on much during the conversation, with me sounding very rigid and curmudgeonly and him taking on an optimistic view I did not expect. I respect this person a great deal, so as he continued to argue for the benefits and usefulness of these systems in his life I felt a desire to better understand where he was coming from. Towards the end of the conversation he gave me a blanket challenge:&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>